3/21/2023 0 Comments All expanse books in orderAccordingly, he thinks the traditional six-day chronological view of Genesis 1 puts an unnecessary barrier between Christianity and science: He does not argue the Bible itself teaches Darwinian evolution, but he certainly wants Christians to interpret the Bible in a way that makes room for it. It is clear LeFebvre affirms evolution and does not think it is at odds with Scripture. Like many scholars, LeFebvre wants to appeal to modern academic sensibilities. Most concerning is the last chapter, “A Calendar for Sabbath, Not Science,” so we will start there. I appreciate the promotion of Sabbath practice, but I find LeFebvre’s treatment of Old Testament history to be lacking. This provides LeFebvre the groundwork to argue in Part 3 that Genesis 1 is not historical chronology and should only be read as the basis for the weekly Sabbath. However, things start to take a turn in Part 2 on “Festivals and Their Stories,” as LeFebvre argues that the feasts are not based in actual historical chronology (we will address this at the end). LeFebvre starts the book with little controversy, as Part 1 on “Israel’s Calendars” is mostly a survey of the calendar system in Israel and the different festivals God commanded. Seeing the book was published by IVP Academic, an imprint of the not-so-conservative InterVarsity Press, I was not surprised by some of LeFebvre’s accommodations to liberal scholarship. It does that, but it also does much more-and not all good. I purchased Michael LeFebvre’s The Liturgy of Creation: Understanding Calendars in Old Testament Context because it sounded like it could provide useful information on the Old Testament festivals and calendar.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |